January 10, 2005

Temple Cleansing

In the synoptics this event was recorded near the end of Jesus' days, and led almost immediately to his Passion. It seems that John felt little need for maintaining chronological sequence in his gospel.

Looking at the Bible as a whole it seems clear that what happened here is a continuation or repetition of things that had happened throughout the history of the Hebrew nation. They were constantly slipping back into horrid practices and constantly called to account by the prophets.

What we have is a continuous conflict between prophet and priest. The priest is always allied with the temporal power, and the prophet always attempts to bring the people back to their spiritual calling. As Jesus said, they stoned the prophets and built monuments afterward; the temple of his day was such a monument. Moslems are supposed to honor Jesus as a prophet, which indicates more insight than we customarily show.

We're still doing it of course. We need another prophet to denounce the Church for confirming our warlike stance.


At 11:49 a.m., Blogger david said...

It seems that John felt little need for maintaining chronological sequence in his gospel.That is of course the current historical-critical wisdom and I'm far from qualified to go up agaisnt it.

But what if the reverse were true? What is John's chronology were true and the Synoptics put the cleansing of the temple late to make some point or other?

At 2:32 p.m., Blogger Larry said...

It's certainly possible, David. Some people have dated John before the others.

At 7:39 p.m., Blogger Marjorie said...

Another theory is that Jesus cleansed the temple twice and John reports the first time and the synoptics report the second.


Post a Comment

<< Home